UO Comparison

Ontologies

UO Comparison

<nolatex> Fig. uo-comparison: </nolatex>Comparision of Upper Level Ontologies
PropertyDevelopersDimensionsLanguagesSID

1

Aristotle Aristotle 10 concepts ^AristotleOntology

2

BFO Smith, Grenon, Stenhorn, Spear 36 classes related via the is_a relation OWL ^Bfo

3

Cyc Cycorp about 300.000 concepts, 3.000.000 assertions (facts and rules), 15.000 relations (these numbers include microtheories) CycL, OWL ^CycOntology

4

DOLCE Guarino and other researchers of the LOA About 100 concepts and 100 axioms First Order Logic, KIF, OWL ^DolceOntology

5

GFO The Onto-Med Research Group 79 classes, 97 sublasses-relations, 67 properties First Order Logic, KIF, OWL ^Gfo

6

GFO The Onto-Med Research Group 79 classes, 97 sublasses-relations, 67 properties First Order Logic, KIF, OWL ^GFO

7

Ontology4 bense.com 400 concepts, 250 relations, 150 verbs / activities PQL, OQL, SQL ^O4Ontology

8

PROTON Ontotext Lab, Sirma 300 concepts and 100 properties OWL Lite ^PROTON

9

schema.org Sponsors: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft 130 concepts ^schema.org

10

Sextett Ontology ^SextettOntology

11

Sowa Sowa 30 classes, 5 relationships, 30 axioms First Order Modal Language, KIF ^SowaOntology

12

SUMO Niles, Pease, Menzel 20.000 terms and 60.000 axioms (including domain ontologies) SUO-KIF, OWL ^SumoOntology

Extension: deriver.app

Zurück zur Ontologies-Übersicht; Projekt- und Ontologie-Setup: Deriver documentation.

Source: taoke.de — UO Comparison.